← Back to Blog
The Transition6 min read

The Calculus of Leaving

Key Takeaway

Financial independence creates optionality—but optionality is worthless if you never use it.

Everyone thought I was having a midlife crisis. The reality was more calculated than that: financial independence had given me optionality, and optionality was demanding that I actually use it.

The First Exit

In October 2023, I stepped away from MongoDB. Not permanently—I took a sabbatical. Nearly two decades of climbing, from startup salesperson in Milan to executive at one of the most successful database companies on the planet, and I needed to stop and ask a question I’d been avoiding:

What am I optimizing for?

I didn’t have an answer. That was the problem.

The sabbatical wasn’t an escape. It was a strategic reset. I needed to unlearn the muscle memory of executive life. The calendar packed with meetings I didn’t need to attend. The optimization for metrics that weren’t mine. The identity wrapped up in a title. I gave myself a full year. No commitments. No “advisory roles.” No consulting to pay the bills. Just space to think, build, and figure out what game I actually wanted to play.

That year changed everything—and not in the way I expected. Because at the end of it, I went back.

The Return

In October 2024, I rejoined MongoDB as VP of Global Sales Development. A bigger role. A global mandate. On paper, it was the dream re-entry: the company welcomed me back, the scope was larger, the comp was right.

I wanted to give it one honest, final try. I owed myself that. The sabbatical had given me clarity about what I valued, but I needed to test whether corporate life could still deliver it at the right altitude.

It couldn’t.

The role was good. The company was good. But I’d changed. After a year of thinking for myself, building for myself, and answering only to my own judgment, I couldn’t un-see what I’d seen. I kept optimizing for a game I’d already won. The next milestone. The next compensation band. I was perfecting a machine I’d already built. The question wasn’t whether I could keep going—it was whether I still cared enough to.

Thirteen months after coming back, in November 2025, I resigned. I stayed through February 2026 to close things out properly. And then I left for good.

The Math of “Enough”

After nearly two decades in tech, working at companies that rewarded high performance with meaningful equity, I’d crossed a threshold. Not “never work again” money. But “work on what I want” money. “Take a few years to figure it out” money. Optionality money.

Here’s what I calculated, roughly:

  • Burn rate for a comfortable but not extravagant life: covered
  • Runway to experiment without immediate revenue pressure: 2–3 years
  • Cost of not taking this window: higher than I was willing to pay

The last one mattered most. I was 46. I had energy, skills, relationships, and ideas. I also had a growing suspicion that if I didn’t make a move now—having already tested the alternative and found it wanting—I’d wake up at 55 with the same questions and fewer options.

Could Leave vs. Should Leave

This distinction matters. A lot of people in my position could leave. Financial independence is more common in senior tech roles than people admit. But “could” is different from “should.”

“Could leave” is about resources. “Should leave” is about fit. I was good at my job—arguably very good. But the gap between “good at this” and “this is what I should be doing” had become a chasm. The sabbatical had shown me the gap. Going back had confirmed it was permanent.

Most people who take sabbaticals come back refreshed and recommitted. I came back with proof that I needed to leave.

The First 90 Days (After the Real Exit)

Everyone asks about this. “What’s it like?” As if I’ve been to a different planet and can report back.

The honest answer is: disorienting, then clarifying. And different from the sabbatical, because this time it was permanent.

The identity vacuum hit first. For nearly two decades, I introduced myself as a title. VP at MongoDB. Before that, director at something else. It was shorthand for credibility, success, social proof. During the sabbatical, I’d had a taste of this—but I always had the safety net of “I’m going back.” This time, there was no safety net. You discover how much of your self-concept was rented, not owned. Rebuilding it is uncomfortable. It’s also the most important work I’ve done.

Then came the structural challenge. I thought I’d have endless time. I was wrong. Without the scaffolding of a corporate calendar, you have to build your own operating rhythm. I over-indexed on structure some weeks (old habits) and let things dissolve into chaos on others. I’m still calibrating, but I’ve found that the discipline of building a company is actually a better framework than any corporate routine ever was.

And then, the work itself. Building LeanAI Studio is objectively harder than managing a team at MongoDB. More ambiguity. Less support. No infrastructure. But every decision is mine. The wins feel bigger because the stakes are personal. The losses cut deeper for the same reason. I haven’t felt this engaged in years.

The Window

If you’re reading this and recognizing something in it, here’s what I’ve learned:

The trap isn’t that you can’t leave. The trap is that you convince yourself you shouldn’t. That the money, the title, the trajectory—somehow you owe them your continued presence.

You don’t.

The skills that got you to this level don’t disappear when you step away. If anything, they become more valuable when applied to something you actually care about. The network, the pattern recognition, the operational discipline—all of it transfers. What doesn’t transfer is time. The window where you have energy, risk tolerance, and the psychological freedom to try something different doesn’t stay open forever.

I almost didn’t do this. I took a sabbatical and went back. I almost became the person who sees the exit, walks up to it, and turns around because the familiar is easier. Who accumulates optionality like a trophy but never cashes it in. Who lets the option expire, the window close, the identity calcify.

Going back was the best thing I could have done—because it removed the last doubt. I’m not leaving because I’m running away from something. I’m leaving because I tried staying, and I know now that what I’m running toward matters more.

I’m glad I didn’t wait any longer.